<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missionary rhetoric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.willbenton.com/2009/08/missionary-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willbenton.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=fv+&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.willbenton.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fmissionary-rhetoric%2F&amp;seed_title=Missionary+rhetoric</link>
	<description>a weblog by Will Benton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:20:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://willbenton.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=fv+&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.willbenton.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fmissionary-rhetoric%2F&amp;seed_title=Missionary+rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-514944</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.willbenton.com/?p=1586#comment-514944</guid>
		<description>Huh.  Sounds a lot like politics, don&#039;t it?!  My persuasive writing class taught that in an introduction, you&#039;re supposed to start with a statement/fact that&#039;s acceptable to the party you&#039;re writing to (and that they really care about) and then twist it by explaining how it&#039;s actually a faulty assumption (or - in policy/religious terms - will not lead to the desired result).  Perhaps they should have followed that strategy instead.  Somewhere in between what they did and being the guys holding the posterboards that say we&#039;re all damned to hell.   :)

I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall for that conversation.  They probably prayed for you after you closed the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  Sounds a lot like politics, don&#8217;t it?!  My persuasive writing class taught that in an introduction, you&#8217;re supposed to start with a statement/fact that&#8217;s acceptable to the party you&#8217;re writing to (and that they really care about) and then twist it by explaining how it&#8217;s actually a faulty assumption (or &#8211; in policy/religious terms &#8211; will not lead to the desired result).  Perhaps they should have followed that strategy instead.  Somewhere in between what they did and being the guys holding the posterboards that say we&#8217;re all damned to hell.   :)</p>
<p>I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall for that conversation.  They probably prayed for you after you closed the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://willbenton.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=fv+&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.willbenton.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fmissionary-rhetoric%2F&amp;seed_title=Missionary+rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-514906</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.willbenton.com/?p=1586#comment-514906</guid>
		<description>Good post. I totally agree. I often wish I had more time to talk to these pseudo-Christian groups. I enjoyed the banter back in high school and college but find it more disruptive now. I really ought to care much more and take more time to speak with them.  Thanks for reminding me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I totally agree. I often wish I had more time to talk to these pseudo-Christian groups. I enjoyed the banter back in high school and college but find it more disruptive now. I really ought to care much more and take more time to speak with them.  Thanks for reminding me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
